| |
FYS is not primarily a writing course. It is the Mercer course, which
introduces students to the critical and creative ambience of Mercer, to
the university way of critical thinking, and to learning as a vocation.
As a part of its teaching of these high subjects, FYS emphasizes seminar-style
discussion and requires extensive writing.
At
its best FYS incorporates:
-
- Exploration
of life questions, e.g. Why am I here? (as the writer and
farmer Wendell Berry puts it, “What are people for?”),
Who do I want to be? What should I retain from my communities of
origin and what should I discard?
-
Development of the ability to make rationally-defensible and personally-authentic
decisions.
-
Exploration of the connections that exist among people, academic
subjects, and the entire mosaic of life experiences. FYS is the
course in which it is most likely that first-year students will
be engaged in the process of negotiating their places in the adult
world and dealing with loss, identity, and openness to change and
difference.
-
Exploration of ways to be active citizens. Helping students change from
being dependent young adults to being an independent, individually responsible
adults.
-
The opening of minds to the world we refuse to see. The prophetic
ethos which Mercer has always embodied calls into question the assumptions
of society and helps students gain a critical distance on the dominant
ideologies of the time. FYS provides an environment in which it is safe
to explore what we think, disagree respectfully, listen carefully to
ourselves and others, and reflect thoughtfully.
-
Reading, discussing, interpreting, and writing about engaging texts,
and the teachers' flexibility to deal with issues important to students'
lives that the texts raise but may not address directly.
-
Helping students toward deeper relationships with texts and with ideas;
trying to lead them out of reductive thinking and toward the more careful
thought that will enable them to deal with the world of symbols rather
than being helplessly susceptible to others' manipulation of symbols.
-
Respecting all these standards.
|
|